Skip to content
Friday, June 13, 2025
  • TV Schedule
  • Shows
    • The Anchormen
    • Real America
    • The Matt Gaetz Show
    • Fine Point
    • The Real Story
    • Tipping Point
    • Weekly Briefing
    • Nights
  • Contact
  • Shop
  • Search
  • facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
One America News logo

One America News Network

Your Nation. Your News.
Watch One America News anywhere with a FREE 7-day trial with OAN Live!
One America News logo
  • Home
  • Top News
  • Commentary
  • Business
    • Business
    • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Noticias Latinas
  • Video
    • OAN News
    • The Anchormen
    • Real America
    • The Matt Gaetz Show
    • Fine Point
    • The Real Story
    • Tipping Point
    • Nights
    • Pearson Sharp Reports
    • The Scoop
  • LIVE

Florida Files Lawsuit Against Target Over DEI Policies

SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA - FEBRUARY 28: A customer walks into a Target store on February 28, 2023 in San Rafael, California. Target reported fourth quarter earnings that beat analyst expectations with revenue of $31.40 billion compared to $30.46 billion expected by analysts. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
A customer walks into a Target store on February 28, 2023 in San Rafael, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

OAN Staff James Meyers
11:35 AM – Friday, February 21, 2025

The Sunshine State has filed a federal lawsuit against Target, claiming the retail chain misled investors by failing to disclose that they would be selling diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) merchandise, specifically for its LGBTQ+ Pride merchandise line in 2023.

The lawsuit, which was filed on behalf of the State Board of Administration, claims that Target’s stock value plummeted after consumer backlash and boycotts, which led to billions in losses. The case is one of at least three similar lawsuits against the retailer in Florida. 

The suit comes almost a month after Target got rid of its DEI policies after immense pressure from Conservatives and President Donald Trump’s vows to roll back DEI policies. 

Advertisement

Target CEO Brian Cornell, and its Board of Directors were named as defendants, accusing them of violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by failing to disclose the risks of their Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and DEI initiatives.

Additionally, the suit will include all investors who purchased Target stock between March 9, 2022, and August 16, 2023. 

The controversy stems from Target’s 2023 Pride campaign, which included merchandise that drew heavy criticism. 

As a result, Target’s stock suffered its biggest and longest losing streak in over two decades, which caused claims that the company’s officials failed to warn investors about the financial risks of rolling out DEI merchandise, the lawsuit states. 

Florida attorney general, James Uthmeier (R-Fla.) has stated that holding corporations accountable for their ESG and DEI policies will be a focus as attorney general. 

 “Corporations that push radical leftist ideology at the expense of financial returns jeopardize the retirement security of Florida’s first responders and teachers,” Uthmeier said in a prepared statement. “My office will stridently pursue corporate reform so that companies get back to the business of doing business — not offensive political theatre.”

“Target misled and defrauded its investors, destroying billions in shareholder value to serve its management’s corrosive, radical, and deeply destructive social agenda. America First Legal is proud to continue this fight with our co-counsel Lawson Huck and Boyden Gray. We would like to thank Attorney General James Uthmeier for his leadership in bringing Florida into this fight to protect Florida’s hard-working citizens from abuse and financial loss at the hands of woke corporate elites,” said America First Legal Senior Vice President Reed D. Rubinstein.

“When Target went all-in on DEI, shareholders paid the price. With our co-counsel America First Legal and Lawson Huck Gonzalez PLLC, we intend to help every possible person harmed by Target’s choice to put politics over business,” said Jonathan Berry, Managing Partner of Boyden Gray PLLC.

Meanwhile, Target has denied any wrongdoing. In a previous court filing in another case in the state, the retail chain argued that it “repeatedly warned investors of the risk” of consumer backlash related to its Pride merchandise.

Target’s legal team dismissed the claims as an attempt to litigate “business judgement,” claiming that disagreeing with corporate decisions does not mean it’s a valid securities fraud claim. 

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Share this post!

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • LinkedIn

Post navigation

Previous Previous post: Former Kentucky AG Announces Bid To Replace McConnell In Senate Seat
Next Next post: Trump’s Vision For Cheaper Gas: Policy Changes Ahead
SOUTH HAVEN, MICHIGAN - JULY 4: California Gov. Gavin Newsom campaigns for President Joe Biden at the Van Buren County Democratic Party's
Which path best serves California’s future — Trump’s direction or Newsom’s policies?
Poll Logo
Make America healthy again and save on all your essential medications with code OANN20 at allfamilypharmacy.com/OAN

CORPORATE

  • About OAN
  • Press Releases
  • Affiliate Relations
  • Press Kit
  • Certifications

NEWS

  • OAN Newsroom
  • OAN Contribution
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  • Noticias Latinas

TELEVISION

  • Shows
  • TV Schedule
  • Where to Watch
  • Watch LIVE TV

GET IN TOUCH

  • Contact OAN
  • Careers
  • Submit Content
  • Subscribe to News Alerts
  • facebook
  • X
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • One America News
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclosures
  • Cookie Policy
2025 © Herring Networks, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Skip to content
Open toolbar Accessibility Tools

Accessibility Tools

  • Increase TextIncrease Text
  • Decrease TextDecrease Text
  • GrayscaleGrayscale
  • High ContrastHigh Contrast
  • Negative ContrastNegative Contrast
  • Light BackgroundLight Background
  • Links UnderlineLinks Underline
  • Readable FontReadable Font
  • Reset Reset
  • HelpHelp
  • FeedbackFeedback