Georgia Judge Blocks Court Order Requiring Ballots To Be Individually Hand-Counted
Signs direct people where to go to cast their votes on the first day of early voting at Atlanta Metropolitan State College on October 15, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia. Early voting takes place from October 15 – November 1, ahead of Election Day on November 5. (Photo by Megan Varner/Getty Images)
OAN Staff Blake Wolf 5:50 PM – Wednesday, October 16, 2024
Judge Robert McBurney struck down the hand count rule, which was passed in September by the State Election Board after passing on a 3-2 vote. The rule would have required precinct poll managers, along with poll officers, to count each individual ballot by hand, ensuring that the tallies match the ballot totals that the machines counted.
McBurney claimed that the “11th-and-one-half hour implementation of the hand count rule” would reduce the public’s confidence in election outcomes, stating that poll workers would be counting the ballots “in a manner unknown and untested in the era of ballot scanning devices” without any uniform training.
“This election season is fraught; memories of January 6 have not faded away, regardless of one’s view of that date’s fame or infamy. Anything that adds uncertainty and disorder to the electoral process disserves the public,” McBurney continued, adding that the rule would have added “a substantial threat of irreparable harm.”
Officials revealed that there were over 459,000 Georgia voters who cast their ballot within the first day of voting, which more than tripled the previous record of 136,000 in 2020.
Meanwhile, Democrats have come out and applauded the judge’s ruling, including the Harris campaign.
“From the beginning, this rule was an effort to delay election results to sow doubt in the outcome, and our democracy is stronger thanks to this decision to block it,” Democrat party officials stated, relaying the message from the Harris campaign.
“From the beginning, this rule was an effort to delay election results to sow doubt in the outcome, and our democracy is stronger thanks to this decision to block it. We will continue fighting to ensure that voters can cast their ballot knowing it will count,” Harris officials said in a joint statement.
Additionally, the Cobb County board also argued against the new rule, claiming that it would “substantially alter Georgia’s election procedures on the eve of” the upcoming election. Lawyers representing the board referenced Georgia’s attorney general memorandum which argued that the election results changing this close to a major election could “result in voter confusion and consequent incentive to remain away from the polls.”
An attorney representing the state board argued that the concerns of Democrats and McBurney were merely “hypothetical, on top of conjectures, on top of speculation,” insinuating that they were just excuses.
The state board also added that it wouldn’t be difficult to train the election workers to manually count the ballots ahead of the election.
“What I don’t want to do is set a precedent that we are OK with speed over accuracy,” stated Janelle King, a Republican member of the election board who argued that the delay in results stemming from the manual counting would be worth ensuring the accuracy of the votes.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.