Federal judge blocks Trump’s National Guard deployment to Los Angeles

Members of the National Guard patrol at Gallery Place Metro Station on December 3, 2025 in Washington, DC. Members of the National Guard continue their presence, under an executive order by President Donald Trump, in the nation’s capital after two of them were shot by a suspected gunman, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, an Afghan immigrant who had working ties with the CIA, killing Army Spc. Sarah Beckstrom and wounded Air Force Staff Sgt. Andrew Wolfe blocks away from the White House on November 26, a day before Thanksgiving. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) / U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an event at Mount Airy Casino Resort on December 9, 2025 in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania. Trump discussed his administration's economic agenda and its efforts to lower the cost of living. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
(Background) Members of the National Guard patrol at Gallery Place Metro Station on December 3, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) / (R) U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an event at Mount Airy Casino Resort on December 9, 2025, in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Katherine Mosack
7:25 AM – Thursday, December 11, 2025

A judge ruled that the Trump administration cannot deploy the California National Guard in Los Angeles and must return the troops to the state’s control.

U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer made the order on Wednesday, rejecting the administration’s claim that the rising number of immigration demonstrations in the city constituted a “rebellion.” He also signed a temporary restraining order requiring the administration to return control of the guard to California Governor Gavin Newsom.

In June, the federal government had directed 2,000 guardsmen to be stationed in Los Angeles to respond to large anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests. Under U.S.C. Section 12406, a sitting president may federalize the National Guard in cases of a foreign invasion or when the president is “unable to execute the law.”

California sued over the deployment, arguing that the president was using the guard as his own personal police force in violation of a law limiting the use of the military for domestic affairs.

In a 35-page order, Breyer said that the deployment is “contrary to law,” however, and risks “creating a national police force made up of state troops.”

Advertisement

“The founders designed our government to be a system of checks and balance,” Breyer said on Wednesday. “Defendants, however, make clear that the only check they want is a blank one.”

President Donald Trump argued that the federal government’s intervention was necessary due to Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass’s inaction in the face of rioting and looting.

“If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can’t do their jobs, which everyone knows they can’t, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!” the president said in a Truth Social post, referring to a derogatory nickname for the governor.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

 

What do YOU think? Click here to jump to the comments!


Sponsored Content Below

 

Share this post!