Disney sues Gov. DeSantis over political retaliation
(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)
OAN Brooke Mallory UPDATED 11:45 AM – Wednesday, April 26, 2023
Disney filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against Florida Governor Ron DeSantis over his alleged “takeover” of the state’s theme park district. Disney claimed that DeSantis engaged in a “targeted campaign of government retaliation” because the company objected to a law referred to as “Don’t Say Gay” by its critics.
Advertisement
However, the phrase “don’t say gay” is deceptive to what the legislation actually entails, since it revolves around the elimination of federal funding for materials and lessons to educate kindergarten through third-grade students about sexual behavior, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender dysphoria, and transgenderism.
Besides DeSantis (R-Fla.), many other U.S. GOP representatives have expressed support for the bill.
“This common-sense bill is straightforward. No federal tax dollars should go to any federal, state, or local government agencies, or private organizations that intentionally expose children under 10 years of age to sexually explicit material,” said Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.).
Critics of the bill claim that “it’s concerning and a transparent political attempt at erasing LGBTQ+ identities.”
DeSantis, who frequently refers to Disney’s new company principles as “woke,” is being accused of running a campaign to target Disney for its political viewpoints. According to Disney, DeSantis “orchestrated at every step'” of this campaign, which is now endangering the company’s operations.
Minutes after a DeSantis-appointed Disney World oversight board voted to invalidate a contract that gave the business control over theme park design and construction, the lawsuit was filed in Tallahassee, Florida.
The governor, who is expected to run for president, and Disney, a significant corporate force and Florida’s leading source of tourism, have been engaged in a long-running battle.
However, business leaders and the governor’s competitors for the White House have consistently criticized DeSantis’ battle with Disney, viewing it as an unprecedented repudiation of conservative principles of limited government.
The conflict started last year when Disney openly challenged state legislation that inhibited teachers from teaching about sexual orientation and gender identity to young students.
DeSantis retaliated by taking control of Disney World’s self-governing district and forming a new board of supervisors to manage governmental services at the theme parks.
However, the business pushed through a last-minute arrangement that significantly reduced the new supervisors’ power before the new board took over.
The DeSantis board declared on Wednesday that Disney’s action to maintain control over their property was in fact illegal and carried out without the required amount of public notice.
“Disney picked the fight with this board. We were not looking out for a fight… Bottom line, what our lawyers have told us, is factually and legally what they created is an absolute legal mess. It will not work,” said Martin Garcia, chair of the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District.
Disney’s sloppy and futile attempt to subvert the will of the Legislature and Floridians was uncovered by our state oversight board and their 11th hour agreements will be nullified by the Legislature.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.